open access to scientific and medical research
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
Dove Medical Press is a member of the OAI.
Bulk reprints for the pharmaceutical industry.
We offer real benefits to our authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Register your specific details and specific drugs of interest and we will match the information you provide to articles from our extensive database and email PDF copies to you promptly.
Back to Journals » Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare » Volume 15
Authors Alwafi H , Alwafi R, Naser AY , Samannodi M , Aboraya D, Salawati E , Alqurashi A, Ekram R, Alzahrani AR, Aldhahir AM , Assaggaf H , Almatrafi M
Received 18 August 2022
Accepted for publication 13 September 2022
Published 23 September 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 2129—2139
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Hassan Alwafi,1,2 Reham Alwafi,3 Abdallah Y Naser,4 Mohammed Samannodi,1 Dalia Aboraya,5 Emad Salawati,6 Afnan Alqurashi,7 Rakan Ekram,8 Abdullah R Alzahrani,1 Abdulelah M Aldhahir,9 Hamza Assaggaf,10 Mohammed Almatrafi11
1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Al-Abidiyah, P.O.Box 13578, Makkah 21955 Saudi Arabia; 2Al-Noor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Clinical Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isra University, Amman, Jordan; 5Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 6Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 7Independent Researcher, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 8School of Public Health and Health Informatics, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 9Respiratory Therapy Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia; 10Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia; 11Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence: Hassan Alwafi, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Al-Abidiyah, P.O. Box 13578, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966 555544319, Email [email protected]
Background: Previous studies investigating the impact of social media influencers on food consumption are limited. Therefore, this study explores the influence of social media on people’s health choices to understand the consequences of food consumption among the Saudi community.
Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia between 24 June and 20 July 2021. A convenience sample of eligible participants was used to recruit the study participants. A 32-items questionnaire was distributed via social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and Instagram). In addition, significant predictors of people being affected by social media to change diet and living with obesity were determined using binary logistic regression.
Results: A total of 1124 participants were involved in this study. More than half of them (57.8%) were females and aged below 40 years (57.4%). The study participants’ median body mass index (BMI) was 27.4 kg/m2 (IQR: 23.5– 32.5). Around one-third of the study participants (36.6%) reported following influencers on social media. The median attitude score for the study participants was 15.00 (IQR: 1.00– 27.00) out of 72, equal to 20.8%, which highlights that social media influence the diet of around one-fifth of the study participants. Males were less likely to be affected by social media than females (OR: 0.51; (95% CI: 0.40– 0.65). Participants with obesity and participants who had tried a diet to lose weight were more likely to be affected by social media, with odds ratios of 2.14, and 4.83, respectively. Followers of social media influencers were 10-folds more likely to be affected by social media than others.
Conclusion: This study showed that social media might influence the food consumption manner in the Saudi population.
Keywords: social media, obesity, food consumption, Saudi Arabia, Twitter, Snapchat
Food consumption is one of the most vital daily practices that affect the performance of the entire human body throughout the day.1 Various external factors influence this practice, and social media significantly affects technology and new trends.2 For example, social media is defined as
Internet-based channels that allow users to interact opportunistically and selectively self-present, either in real-time or asynchronously, with both broad and narrow audiences who derive value from user-generated content and the perception of interaction with others.3
In 2019, the General Authority for Statistics released the Saudi Youth Development Survey results. The survey showed that about 67% of the Saudi population were between 0 and 34 years, and the age group 15–34 years old were accounted for almost 37% of the total population (51.03% and 48.97% for males and females, respectively). The survey’s results showed that 98.43% of them had accounts on social networking sites.4
The use of social media is increasing in developing countries. In 2021, almost 4 billion people are using social media worldwide, a two-fold increase since 2015.5 In Saudi Arabia, 68% of the Saudi population were active on social media in 2019.6 Saudi Arabia is among the top countries to use Twitter worldwide.7 Twitter is one of the most widely used social media platforms today, and it is becoming a very common data source platform, including health related research.8 The way social media is changing the food habits of people is through advertisements, news, and posts on different platforms.9 Social media influencers can be defined as famous content creators with many followers, promoting products and services to inspire others.10 Influencers on social media represent new, independent external advocates who shape audience behavior through posts, blogs, and tweets.10 The popularity of a social media influencer depends on a more favorable attitude among their followers toward purchasing products and brands advertised by the influencer.11 In Saudi Arabia, social media influencers mainly promote restaurants that serve high-energy-dense food rather than restaurants serving low-energy-dense food.12
Obesity is a significant health concern worldwide, and the number of people suffering from obesity is growing worldwide, with more than 1.9 billion (39%) of adults overweight in 2016.13 Obesity is often associated with a higher risk for developing metabolic syndromes including hypertension and diabetes.14 However, it is also associated with other morbidities and poor outcomes.15 Obesity in the Gulf region has long been an issue due to generally unhealthy food habits, especially in Saudi Arabia.16 For example, Saudi Arabia has obesity (BMI ≥ 30) prevalence of 24.7%, of which 10.2% also suffer from Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.17 Obesity is mainly associated with diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, sleep disorders, and some forms of cancer.18 The global obesity crisis stems from genetic susceptibility, a heavy decrease in the requirement for physical activity, and abundant availability of high-energy foods.19
The use of social media is associated with eating disorders and negative body images, which mainly affect young users.20 A higher negative body image and unhealthy food decisions have been linked to social media image-related interactions between young adults influenced by social media.21 In addition, watching videos posted by social media influencers on various social media platforms could lead to a future health crisis that significantly impacts the younger generation’s health, this could be due changes in the eating behavior, eating timing and also sleeping hours.22
Over the past decade, social media has allowed internet users to interact on unlimited topics, including health and weight management. However, with the continued growth of social media and its expanding impact, it is vital to understand how social media impacts eating disorders. For example, people can easily be influenced by social media posts without realizing it when making food-related decisions. The association between watching blogs or social media and unhealthy dietary patterns has not been studied. Therefore, this study explores the effects of social media on food consumption and obesity in the Saudi population.
A cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia between 24 June and 20 July 2021. Participants aged 18 years and above and living in Saudi Arabia were eligible to complete the survey.
A convenience sample of eligible participants was used to recruit the study participants. Participants were invited to participate in this study through social media (Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, and Instagram). The study sample was invited using a survey link. All participants voluntarily participated in the study and were thus considered exempt from written informed consent. Study aims and objectives were clearly explained at the beginning of the invitation letter of the survey.
The inclusion criteria were participants aged 18 years and above and living in Saudi Arabia.
This study adapted and used a previously validated questionnaire.23 To achieve the study’s aim, a 32-item questionnaire was distributed. It is comprised of two sections. The first section (14 items) asked the participants about their sociodemographic characteristics. The second section (18 items) explored the impact of social media influencers on food consumption. Each item in the second section was scored using a five-point Likert scale that ranged from zero (never) to four (very often). The total possible score for this scale ranged from 0 to 72. We interpreted the participants’ score based on the mid-point of the highest possible score of the scale (equal to 36). The lower the score, the less likely the participant was affected by social media changing their dietary habits.
The questionnaire tool’s reliability and validity were previously investigated among 247 Turkish university students. By using Lawshe’s method and contacting eight experts with at least five years of experience and a background in nutrition and dietetics, the content validity index and content validity ratio were evaluated. There are thirty-eight items in the item pool. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to assess the validity of the constructs and the theoretical framework. The Cronbach’s alpha value and Spearman-Brown coefficient were noted for the reliability component. It was assessed whether or not the total score could be determined based on the results of the Tukey non-additivity test. 27% of the sample’s top and lowest total scores were compared using an independent samples t test to look into item discrimination. The original scale’s overall reliability coefficient was determined to be 0.928.
The target sample size was estimated based on the WHO recommendations for the minimal sample size needed for a prevalence study.24 Using a confidence interval of 95%, a standard deviation of 0.5, a margin of error of 5%, the required sample size was 385 participants from each study population.
The Research Ethics Committee approved this study at Umm Al Qura University, College of Medicine.
Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software, version 27 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. A binary logistic regression determined significant predictors of people being affected by social media to change diet and living with obesity. The median participants’ scores (15.00 (IQR: 1.00–27.00)) were used as a cut-off point to identify the dummy variable for the logistic regression analysis and to identify participants who were more likely to be affected by social media in terms of changing their diet. A confidence interval of 95% (P < 0.05) was applied to represent the statistical significance of the results, and the level of significance was predetermined as 5%.
A total of 1124 participants were involved in this study. More than half of them (57.8%) were females and aged below 40 years (57.4%) (Table 1). Around 47.0% of them reported that they had a bachelor’s degree. In addition, 97.1% of the participants reported living in an urban area. More than half of them (66.2%) were married. The study participants’ median BMI was 27.4 kg/m2 (IQR: 23.5–32.5). Only 23.2% of the study participants reported exercising regularly (3–4 times a week). Most of the study participants (79.7%) reported trying a diet to lose weight for one year. Around one-third of the study participants (36.6%) reported that they follow influencers on social media, such as celebrities, coaches, and athletes, while 29.5% reported that they sometimes follow social media influencers.
Table 1 Demographics Characteristics of the Study Participants
Table 1 Demographics Characteristics of the Study Participants
Our data shows participants’ responses to items measuring their attitude towards social media (Table 2). The median attitude score for the study participants was 15.00 (IQR: 1.00–27.00) out of 72, which is equal to 20.8%. This highlights that social media influences the diet of around one-fifth of the study participants. Using the median score as the cut-off point for being influenced by social media, we (found that males were less likely to be affected by social media than females (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.40–0.65). The participants’ age was negatively associated with their attitudes towards social media and their diet. Bachelor’s degree holders were the most affected by social media (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.31–2.05) compared to participants with lower education. Singles were more likely (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.37–2.34). Participants with obesity and participants who exercised regularly and had tried a diet to lose weight were more likely to be affected by social media with odds ratios of 2.14, 3.07, and 4.83, respectively. Followers of social media influencers were ten times more likely to be affected by social media than others (Table 3).
Table 2 Participants Response to Items That Measure the Impact of Social Media Towards Eating Attitude
Table 3 Binary Logistic Regression
Table 2 Participants Response to Items That Measure the Impact of Social Media Towards Eating Attitude
Table 3 Binary Logistic Regression
On the other hand, the binary logistic regression results showed that being a male is more likely to be associated with living with obesity (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.47–2.43). The age was associated with more odds of living with obesity, with participants aged 51 and older having higher odds of living with obesity, 30–40 years (OR:1.87; 95% CI:1.46–2.40), 41–50 years, (OR: 3.86; 95% CI: 2.77–5.36) and 51 and older (OR: 3.40; 95% CI 2.46–4.70). Divorced participants were more likely to be living with obesity (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.40–4.10), while being single was associated with fewer odds of being living with obesity (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.30–0.50). Participants who have tried a diet to lose weight were more likely to be living with obesity (OR: 3.47; 95% CI: 2.75–4.39).
Participants affected by social media were more likely to be living with obesity (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.76–2.75) (Table 3). Overall, this result might suggest the link between being obese and being affected by social media.
In this study, we conducted a cross sectional online based survey to investigate the impact of social media on food consumption and obesity. We found that the median attitude score for the study participants was 15.00 (IQR: 1.00–27.00) out of 72, equal to 20.8%, which highlights that social media influence the diet of around one-fifth of the study participants. A previous study in Australia, concluded that they found a clear pattern of association between social media use and eating disorders among grade 7 and grade 8 of adolescents.20 The authors of the study reported that more social media accounts were associated with higher eating disorders.20 Similarly, another study in the United States (US) that were conducted on a large cohort of grade eight and eleven of students reported that adolescents who used media for longer hours were associated with a higher odds of unhealthy food and inadequate sleep.22 However, we were unable to compare our results with data from the middle east as found no previous research that were conducted in the Middle East, and we urge for further studies to be conducted.
In our study, males were less likely to be affected by social media than females (OR: 0.51; (95% CI: 0.40–0.65). This was also similar to a previous study in Australia as they found that greater daily time spent using social media was associated with eating disorders for girls.20 Participants living with obesity and participants who had tried a diet to lose weight were more likely to be affected by social media, with odds ratios of 2.14, and 4.83, respectively. Followers of social media influencers were 10-folds more likely to be affected by social media than others.
Developing a negative body image increases eating disorders, including dieting, binging, fasting, calorie counting, and self-induced vomiting, which eventually lead to long-term side effects.25 Moreover, social media exposure increases anxiety among users, which leads to emotional over-eating.26 Specifically, maladaptive usage of Facebook has been associated with bulimic symptoms, over-eating, and body dissatisfaction.27 The issue is that social media content is not regulated nor intensively monitored; therefore, people are exposed to misleading information daily.
Most of the influential social media accounts have many followers. They promote products and lifestyles and share their perception of health and body image messages, often incompatible with health promotion.21 In this study, 36% of participants followed influencers on social media such as celebrities, coaches, and athletes. Moreover, one-fifth of the study participants were influenced by social media when making food-related decisions. Social media influencers can persuade their audience to purchase products, join movements, follow their advice, and shape attitudes and behaviours.28,29 In addition, food advertising on social media works through various mechanisms. For instance, the influencer marketing technique involves the promotion and selling of products or services through social media personalities (“influencers”) who can affect the character of a brand.30 The sight of food provokes various brain responses related to preparation for food and the desire to eat.31 In addition, food advertisements are powerful, and brain reactivity to visual food cues has been shown to predict future weight gain and snack consumption in adolescents.32,33 Food marketing has convincingly demonstrated that exposure to social media depicting unhealthy products, such as sugar, fast food, and snacks, is directly correlated with high consumption among children and adults.34–40 Coates et al reported that social media influencer marketing increases children’s immediate intake of the promoted snack relative to an alternative brand.41
Although most of our study participants held a bachelor’s degree or higher (46.9% and 26.1%, respectively), this seemed to make them more liable to fall for false or misleading information shared by social media influencers and other advertisers. In addition, our study also showed that females were more likely to be affected by the influence of social media. This may also be explained by the gender variation in psychology in the use of telehealth, social media, and motivation to use, which was also discussed in the literature.42 Social media can overwhelm people with contradictory information about healthy food.43 With the amount of information posted daily on social media, it can be challenging for non-experts to distinguish true from false information. For example, our study shows that 26.5% of the study participants rarely read the whole post on social media related to food or nutrition content. This behaviour could give us the insight that when people are unwilling to read the entire post, they will probably not research the given information further. A small percentage of the participants (5.2%) frequently followed nutrition-related content on social media. In contrast, 10.3% of the participants started consuming fast food most of the time after beginning to use social media. This heavy shift of dietary interest of Saudis towards unhealthy and calorie-dense food will only add to the increasing chronic diseases crisis in the kingdom.
This negative influence of social media on people will exacerbate the increasing issues of obesity and chronic diseases. Obesity is a global health concern, affecting ~650 million adults worldwide.44 In 2016, 39% of adults aged 18 years and above (39% of men and 40% of women) were overweight, while about 13% of the world’s adult population (11% of men and 15% of women) were living with obesity in 2016.45 Overweight and obesity are growing in KSA, especially in females, and they are among the well-known causes of coronary artery disease (CAD).46 Obesity was more prevalent among females (female: 33.3%; male: 28.9%) from 1999–2004 in the US.47 In our study, participants living with obesity and those who had tried a diet to lose weight were more likely to be affected by social media. Adolescent obesity has been linked with social networks, including and computer/video games.48
Health care authorities and health care professionals are warranted to increase their awareness programs to educate the public about the complication of unhealthy food. In addition, the Saudi government must consider reviewing its regulation regarding the advertisement process of food on social media. For example, food, soft drink and energy drinks use artificial intelligent to target and promote for unhealthy food, more regulation and perhaps taxation on these products may benefit the general population. Policy maker should also encourage social media influencers to participate in public health awareness and promotion for healthy food.
Our study has several strong points. First, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of social media on food consumption and obesity in the Middle East. Additionally, we used previously validated assessment tools. However, this study has some limitations. First, this study was cross-sectional in study design. Therefore, we could not confirm any association between the use of social media and food consumption or obesity, and we urge future studies to confirm this association. A self-administered questionnaire through an online platform could be biased. However, owing to the current epidemic and the nature of the objective of this study, we assume that we targeted a well-representative sample.
This study found that social media platforms may have a negative impact on food consumption and obesity. Future studies to investigate this association and factors associated with the negative effect of social media on food consumption are warranted.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Medicine at University of Umm Al-Qura, Makkah, Saudi Arabia (No. HAPO-02-K-012-2022-06-670). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. The study was designed and conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin and comply with in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Conceptualization, Hassan Alwafi and Rakan Ekram; Data curation, Mohammed Samannodi, Reham Alwafi and Hassan Alwafi; Formal analysis, Abdallah Y Naser; Investigation, Mohammed Samannodi, Abdallah Naser and Hassan Alwafi; Methodology, Rakan Ekram and Hassan Alwafi; Project administration, Hassan Alwafi; Resources, Mohammed Samannodi and Hassan Alwafi; Supervision, Hassan Alwafi; Validation, Hassan Alwafi; Writing original draft, Reham Alwafi, Afnan Alqurashi, Faisal Minshawi, Emad Salawati, Abdallah Y Naser and Hassan Alwafi; Writing – review & editing, All authors. All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting or revising the article, have agreed on the journal to which the article was submitted, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
The research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this work.
1. Manz K, Mensink G, Finger JD, et al. Associations between physical activity and food intake among children and adolescents: results of German health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents (KiGGS) wave 2. Nutrients. 2019;11(5):1–15. doi:10.3390/nu11051060
2. Serenko A, Turel O, Bohonis H. The impact of social networking sites use on health-related outcomes among UK adolescents. Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2021;3:100058. doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100058
3. Carr CT, Hayes RA. Social media: defining, developing, and divining. Atl J Commun. 2015;23(1):46–65. doi:10.1080/15456870.2015.972282
4. General Authority for Statistics. General Authority for Statistics (GASTAT): (98.43%) of Saudi youth on social networking sites; 2019. Available from: https://www.stats.gov.sa/en/news/365.
5. Dean B. How many people use social media in 2021? (65+ statistics): online Backlinko; 2021 Available from: https://backlinko.com/social-media-users.
6. Agency S. Social media and digital in Saudi Arabia: 2019 report; 2021. Available from: https://www.socializeagency.com/2019/01/30/digital-in-2019-saudi-arabia.
7. Statista. Leading countries based on number of Twitter users as of April 2021; 2021. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-twitter-users-in-selected-countries/.
8. Abeer SAS. Prevalence of smoking among physicians of different specialties in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Arch Fam Med Gen Pract. 2019;3:70–75.
9. Limaye S, Thadathil R. Influence of social media on behavior patterns; 2018.
10. Freberg K, Graham K, McGaughey K, Freberg LA. Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relat Rev. 2011;37(1):90–92. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001
11. Lim X, Radzol ARM, Cheah J, Wong MW. The impact of social media influencers on purchase intention and the mediation effect of customer attitude. Asian J Bus Res. 2017;7(2):19–36. doi:10.14707/ajbr.170035
12. Binsawad M. Social media efficiency towards restaurant business: a comparison between social media profiles (case study in Saudi Arabia). Multimed Tools Appl. 2020;79(41):31389–31399. doi:10.1007/s11042-020-09620-z
13. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
14. Canale MP, Manca Di Villahermosa S, Martino G, et al. Obesity-related metabolic syndrome: mechanisms of sympathetic overactivity. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:865965. doi:10.1155/2013/865965
15. Petrelli F, Cortellini A, Indini A, et al. Association of obesity with survival outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e213520–e. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3520
16. Naeem Z. Increasing trend of junk food use in Saudi Arabia and health implications. Int J Health Sci. 2012;6(1):V–VI. doi:10.12816/0005967
17. Althumiri NA, Basyouni MH, AlMousa N, et al. Obesity in Saudi Arabia in 2020: prevalence, distribution, and its current association with various health conditions. Healthcare. 2021;9(3):1–8.
18. Pi-Sunyer FX. Comorbidities of overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(11 Suppl):S602–8. doi:10.1097/00005768-199911001-00019
19. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000;404(6778):635–643. doi:10.1038/35007508
20. Wilksch SM, O’Shea A, Ho P, Byrne S, Wade TD. The relationship between social media use and disordered eating in young adolescents. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53(1):96–106. doi:10.1002/eat.23198
21. Rounsefell K, Gibson S, McLean S, et al. Social media, body image and food choices in healthy young adults: a mixed methods systematic review. Nutr Diet. 2020;77(1):19–40. doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12581
22. Cha EM, Hoelscher D, Ranjit N, et al. Effect of media use on adolescent body weight. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:2.
23. Keser A, Bayındır-Gümüş A, Kutlu H, Öztürk E. Development of the scale of effects of social media on eating behaviour: a study of validity and reliability. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(10):1677–1683. doi:10.1017/S1368980019004270
24. Naing NN. Determination of sample size. Malays J Med Sci. 2003;10(2):84–86.
25. Neumark-Sztainer D, Paxton SJ, Hannan PJ, Haines J, Story M. Does body satisfaction matter? Five-year longitudinal associations between body satisfaction and health behaviors in adolescent females and males. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39(2):244–251. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.12.001
26. Gao Y, Ao H, Hu X, et al. Social media exposure during COVID-19 lockdowns could lead to emotional overeating via anxiety: the moderating role of neuroticism. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2022;14(1):64–80.
27. Smith AR, Hames JL, Joiner TE
28. Ashley C, Tuten T. Creative strategies in social media marketing: an exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychol Market. 2015;32(1):15–27. doi:10.1002/mar.20761
29. Berryman R, Kavka M. ‘I guess a lot of people see me as a big sister or a friend’: the role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers. J Gend Stud. 2017;26(3):307–320. doi:10.1080/09589236.2017.1288611
30. Hill SR, Troshani I, Chandrasekar D. Signalling effects of vlogger popularity on online consumers. J Comput Inf Syst. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.is.2016.03.011
31. Van der Laan LN, De Ridder DT, Viergever MA, Smeets PA. Appearance matters: neural correlates of food choice and packaging aesthetics. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041738
32. Lawrence NS, Hinton EC, Parkinson JA, Lawrence AD. Nucleus accumbens response to food cues predicts subsequent snack consumption in women and increased body mass index in those with reduced self-control. Neuroimage. 2012;63(1):415–422. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.070
33. Yokum S, Ng J, Stice E. Attentional bias to food images associated with elevated weight and future weight gain: an fMRI study. Obesity. 2011;19(9):1775–1783. doi:10.1038/oby.2011.168
34. Boyland EJ, Nolan S, Kelly B, et al. Advertising as a cue to consume: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute exposure to unhealthy food and nonalcoholic beverage advertising on intake in children and adults, 2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(2):519–533. doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.120022
35. Buijzen M, Schuurman J, Bomhof E. Associations between children’s television advertising exposure and their food consumption patterns: a household diary–survey study. Appetite. 2008;50(2–3):231–239. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.07.006
36. Folkvord F, Anschütz DJ, Boyland E, Kelly B, Buijzen M. Food advertising and eating behavior in children. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016;9:26–31. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.11.016
37. Lipsky LM, Iannotti RJ. Associations of television viewing with eating behaviors in the 2009 health behaviour in school-aged children study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(5):465–472. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1407
38. Pearson N, Biddle SJ, Griffiths P, Johnston JP, Haycraft E. Clustering and correlates of screen-time and eating behaviours among young children. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5698-9
39. Pearson N, Griffiths P, Biddle SJ, Johnston JP, McGeorge S, Haycraft E. Clustering and correlates of screen-time and eating behaviours among young adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4441-2
40. Vereecken CA, Todd J, Roberts C, Mulvihill C, Maes L. Television viewing behaviour and associations with food habits in different countries. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(2):244–250. doi:10.1079/PHN2005847
41. Coates AE, Hardman CA, Halford JCG, Christiansen P, Boyland EJ. The effect of influencer marketing of food and a “protective” advertising disclosure on children’s food intake. Pediatr Obes. 2019;14(10):e12540. doi:10.1111/ijpo.12540
42. Zhang X, Guo X, Lai KH, Guo F, Li C. Understanding gender differences in m-health adoption: a modified theory of reasoned action model. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(1):39–46. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0092
43. Nagler RH. Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages. J Health Commun. 2014;19(1):24–40. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.798384
44. World Health Organization. World Health Organization obesity and overweight fact sheet. 2016.
45. Girdhar S, Sharma S, Chaudhary A, Bansal P, Satija M. An epidemiological study of overweight and obesity among women in an urban area of North India. Indian J Commun Med. 2016;41(2):154. doi:10.4103/0970-0218.173492
46. Al-Nozha MM, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, et al. Obesity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2005;26(5):824–829.
47. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295(13):1549–1555. doi:10.1001/jama.295.13.1549
48. De la Haye K, Robins G, Mohr P, Wilson C. Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks. Soc Networks. 2010;32(3):161–167. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.09.001
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
© Copyright 2022 • Dove Press Ltd • software development by maffey.com • Web Design by Adhesion
The opinions expressed in all articles published here are those of the specific author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dove Medical Press Ltd or any of its employees.
Dove Medical Press is part of Taylor & Francis Group, the Academic Publishing Division of Informa PLC
Copyright 2017 Informa PLC. All rights reserved. This site is owned and operated by Informa PLC ( “Informa”) whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 3099067. UK VAT Group: GB 365 4626 36